Talk:Really Rottens

Even though I changed it to them to be listed as leaders, of course, I still consider them to be captains. Somewhere on these team pages, I would mention that they are captains. Listing them as leaders like that just keeps it all consistent. -- MisterJames (talk) 17:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, their more considered captains since they are mentioned to be in the actual show. Do you think the Creepleys should share a page? -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

I would say, yes, because you could have them all separated, but then there's not really much of a stretch between them all. -- MisterJames (talk) 17:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Okay, that makes sense. We can have the main family page and also have the individual members. -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 18:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't understand. So what are we doing? I thought I agreed to one family page for all of them (although really I'd treat it as a character page, because I'm not really sure about doing other family pages like for the Flintstones and Rubbles), but you've just said the main family page and then also them as individual members. -- MisterJames (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Shared article. I don't think their roles were that big in LaL for them to have individual articles. Yes, I think we should have family pages like the Doos, Flintstones, Rubbles .etc -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 20:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Ten-four on all of that. I spoke with another user who edits here, and she thought it was a good idea for family pages. I'm just not sure how that would look. I mean, when doing a members section, I think it would be a good idea to have it as a family tree section and then actually present it as a family tree, but I'm not sure how to do that. The Stranger Things Wiki has a members section and family tree, but I think having both would be redundant. -- MisterJames (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

I like that idea. I started construction on the main Creepleys article and redirected the individual links to there (except Orful. Since his roles stand out to the rest). I just used the organization infobox for now. -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 21:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I was unsure about using that particular infobox. We need a proper family infobox, of course, with personalised rows. I'm thinking of rows right now, so I can put together one. -- MisterJames (talk) 03:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Sounds like a good idea to make one. I actually was thinking we should have one because it makes more sense than using the regular organization infobox. -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 04:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Villains category

It now seems unnecessary to not have the individual Rottens' members in the villains category because most of them appeared elsewhere. Should I add those members to villains? -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 02:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I think it'd be a good idea to have them covered in both. -- MisterJames (talk) 02:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)