User talk:MisterJames/New role section layout

If nobody has any objections, and I really can't imagine anybody would, I would like to start making these changes. I think overall, it's more thorough than before and works better for us. -- Signed by James (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Sounds totally fine for my tastes. I was honestly hesitant that you would change it to the alphabetical order of franchises instead of chronological order, but it does make sense in some regard. The only question is when exactly do we apply it for some actors, if the roles in question are of a small catalogue. -- QuestJ65 (talk) 23:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

I wasn't sure whether to do it in alphabetical or chronological order, but I just decided to go with the former. It seemed logical. -- Signed by James (talk) 23:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

It should be the same no matter how small the catalogue. If it's one or two franchises, it should still be the same. -- Signed by James (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

I think the years should be removed from the subsections because I think they're confusing things. -- Signed by James (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)