Template talk:Infobox character

For the family rows where it's unclear, I've either been adding "None" when it's obviously clear or "Unknown" where it's debatable, but I find that instead that is really just making something up either way, and that it should just be what is depicted on-screen. If someone is given a relative/sibling/kids, etc., then we list them, but if not, then we just say "None". I still like the idea of saying "Not mentioned" when it comes to parents, because they'll all have parents, but they're not always seen or mentioned. What do you think, Snoopy? -- MisterJames (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * We should definitely mention that. Because even if they aren't seen, we know they exist. Did you know Snagglepuss had a twin brother named "Snaggletooth". -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Wasn't Snaggletooth originally the proto-Snagglepuss? -- MisterJames (talk) 18:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * So, to be clear, what is it that I should be adding and not adding? -- MisterJames (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding. BTW the Snaggletooth twin thing came from the Snagglepuss short "One Two Many". -- Snoopy The Dog (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's been so long, I couldn't remember. -- MisterJames (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Relatives
I think it's a good idea if we have more specific rows like cousins, uncles and aunts, and grandchildren. -- MisterJames (talk) 13:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)